Having reviewed some of the talks I attended at Congress 2015, it’s time to turn to a little personal navel-gazing. Decades of working as a senior administrator means I can’t help myself when it comes to assessing what went well and what wasn’t so successful. How else to improve one’s own performance in any sphere?
It’s always tricky when preparing papers for any seminar to know what the audience expects to hear as there’s inevitably a range of knowledge, experience and aspirations. Then there’s the slides,timing and not wanting to cause death by power-point. I gave two presentations at Congress – this is my own assessment of how they went. Others may well differ.
The marriage of family and local history
There was so much more I’d have liked to include but I whittled away until I felt I had sufficient to tell the story sensibly. While the paper I submitted to the proceedings provided the nuts and bolts of the tools and techniques I’d used, I wanted the presentation on Murphy’s Creek to illustrate how these might come together to tell the story of a place through the marriage of local and family history.
I was pleased with how this talk went as it seemed to be well received by many in the audience. Certainly quite a few people came up to me that day, and later, to comment on what they’d got from it. It was also a pleasure to meet two people from towns near Murphy’s Creek.
The downside was that my little sound snippet on the image of an old barn (the property of Mr Horrocks, mentioned in the extract) refused to work even though it had been fine when I’d tested it multiple times at home…of course.
I have included it here:
You can hear Annie talking to local historian Cameron about the social life in Murphy’s Creek in the early 20th century.
Here too is a graphic which I decided to exclude because (1) it wasn’t necessary and (2) it was too busy. Thanks to Alex from Family Tree Frog blog who introduced me to the mind-mapping tool, Coggle. You never know, someone might find the framework useful.
Harness the power of blogging for your One Place Study (OPS).
This topic suffered a little from confusion over its title in each program (online, app, printed) .…despite the convenor’s best attempts to sort it out. My fault for not noticing sooner and my apologies to those who thought they were getting a talk about blogging per se. Hopefully the paper in the proceedings will make it clearer.
My retrospective assessment is that I hadn’t achieved the depth I’d have liked with this presentation. Perhaps in this case I’d whittled and edited too much. Again the intention was to demonstrate how blogging could be used for a one place study, or indeed your own research. I wanted to highlight the issues I’d encountered in this type of blog – mainly time, and ambivalence about which blog to use. I hope those with an interest in the topic will explore the different styles used by the other OPS blogs I mentioned as well. In retrospect I could also have added some slides showing some of the stories on my two OPS blogs.
Those who are keen can look at my OPS blogs here: East Clare Emigrants and From Dorfprozelten to Australia
Although speakers had a target time of 35 minutes for each presentation, leaving time for questions, I was surprised to finish this talk in 30 minutes. The upside is that it left time for lots of Q&A to involve the audience. Nick Reddan’s question of “why blog, not publish a book?” was pertinent…my response: depends on the project and what you want to achieve. I was really pleased to see the lively dynamic in the Q&A session which lasted 15 minutes and also allowed my geneablogger mates to offer their five bob’s worth too ….thanks genimates! Twitter tells me my quotable quote was “bloggers are part of a gang“…in a good way of course since we support and encourage each other.
The technology was a little frustrating – a problem shared by others – with the screens so far forward and the remote forward-back buttons in different places in the different rooms. I also learned not to wear an outfit with a cowl neckline…something to add to Paul Milner’s “don’t” list.
Thanks to everyone who attended and who offered questions or opinions on what I’d said.
My two papers and the slides are now on this blog under the Presentations tab.
I’ve also added the (different) papers and slides on the East Clare and Dorfprozelten emigrants which I presented at Congress 2006 in Darwin.
Please note: these papers and slides are copyrighted to me. I’d appreciate it if anyone wants to refer to them, that they acknowledge my work.
8 thoughts on “Congress 2015: Navel-gazing”
I enjoyed both of your sessions, Pauleen. They caused us to THINK. Having the extra time for discussion was a positive outcome of your Blog talk as it enabled information sharing.
Thanks for sharing your Coggle mindmap – it is a useful tool and not just for OPS research.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Jill…I know I like to attend sessions which engage my brain so regard that as a compliment 🙂
They both sound interesting. I would have especially liked to have been there for the one place study.
Thanks Kristin .. I’d have liked you to be there so we could meet 🙂
I enjoyed both your sessions Pauleen. The first was very interesting because of the breadth of resources you used to gain such a vivid picture of Murphy’s Creek and the second session increased my interest about doing a One Place Study. The extra time at the end was great for discussion and allowed people to ask questions about blogging which a lot of people seemed to be interested in.
Besides your ‘gang’ quote, the other one I particularly liked was when you wish you could clone yourself…wouldn’t that be super handy!
Thanks Tanya for your feedback…much appreciated. I’m not sure the world is ready for two of me…and four elbows 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hadn’t thought of that! Wonder if we could have clones of you without your elbows? 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person