The final session of Congress 2015 was a Panel discussion entitled Family History Research: why leave home to do it. The panel members were Josh Taylor (FGS and FMP, USA), Carole Riley (SAG) and David Holman (FFHO, UK) and it was moderated by Congress 2015 Official Blogger Jill Ball aka GeniAus.
Jill had a list of questions which were decided by a number nomination from someone in the audience. The number determined which slide came in which order. A tricky way of keeping things lively.
Since there’s no proceedings paper with a focus on societies I thought it might be helpful to present the summary as I typed it up throughout…feel free to correct me if I got something wrong. I may not be able to resist having my threepence worth on a couple of the items too.
Thanks Jill for the change of pace and generating interesting discussions. Thanks also for the use of your slides to check the question titles.
Curt Witcher said at Rootstech that 80-92% of people who “do genealogy” do not belong to a society. How are you going to reverse this trend in your societies?
Josh: Your society needs to know what’s going on…need to be on FB, Twitter or you don’t know what’s going on. FGS (US equivalent of AFFHO) is going to other groups as well.
Stalk the dead, stalk the living
Younger demographic may not like “society” because the term is old-fashioned. Use different term? Try different approach?
David: someone with local knowledge; get with the program of newer strategies, about doing things not just putting out data.
Carole: education – source of how to do it properly
- There are thousands of members on Australian Genealogy FB page but can only comment as an individual not as a page owner eg on behalf of SAG
My thought since coming home: is the term “genealogy” too dated? Would family history capture people’s imaginations more?
The quality of online advice from well-meaning (and inexpert) people on message boards and Facebook groups is sometimes dubious. What can society members do to combat this?
When there is inexpert advice on Facebook (FB)…put your head above parapet and clarify.
In Australia societies are not taking advantage of nationwide promotional activities eg National Family History Month. Do they exist overseas?
David: No (too many other national days); month too long
Josh: NFHM (USA) is October; some societies are really good, some have seminars. Suggests researching which politician is relevant in terms of funding and get them to promote it by researching their family.
Carole: just another job to do
Jill: Shauna said all you have to is relabel your August activities as NFHM and let it be known widely.
How do traditional genies embrace those who want to do it all from home?
Carole: both can learn from each other
David: can’t do it all from home…great to get out
Josh: great that you can do it at home, but there are also extra documents offline (in another talk Josh mentioned only 15% are online).
HAGSOC librarian: collaborate with other society libraries.
Jill: can make society libraries online via Trove
Online genies may be unaware of copyright regulations and the niceties of sharing. How can we educate them in ethical behaviour?
David: legislation varies across nations; may even need legal advice; there are some unethical,people, however some don’t know/understand the basics. Up to FH society to educate them.
Carole: Australian Copyright Council has booklets, talks etc. Buy and share them in our FH libraries.
Josh: great article in FGS mag- getting it wrong by mistake; use examples; dot points of key items
Jill: if you don’t ask, don’t do it; check out Creative Commons
Random Acts of Genealogical Kindness: RAOGKs can make it unnecessary to travel to a repository or visit a society. Online genies can barter with others to make visits, do lookups, take photos etc. What impact do these activities have on societies?
David: society members who live in area will do photos for £5 of grave
Josh: great reason to bring together
Carole: no effect
Do family history shows on TV help or hurt the concept that everything can be done at home?
Josh: have an “elevator pitch” to tell people how to do the research without the quick and easy TV way
David: ordinary people want to see famous brought to their level – not usually famous in previous generation; perhaps get a plug for the society
Carole: shows people it’s not all online as they have to go to different places
How can we promote the joy of holding original documents in our hands with those who do all their research online?
Carole: go to repository to hold/see it; emotions on faces
Josh: hard to convey – impact of dust in archive; video and emotion to see it.
David: archives don’t want you holding original docs.
Jill: Perry McIntyre has inspired her to go to Ireland and see original documents
Many resources found online are transcriptions. What is the danger in relying on these?
Carole: you are going to make mistakes – the more transcriptions, the more errors likely and might be more than in the transcript
David: doesn’t have to be online transcriptions eg Bishops Transcripts have errors ; ditto transcription of certificates and church records
Josh: you miss other records, nuances in original, notations, context of papers, order of data (Couldn’t agree more Josh)
Audience: a contracted person transcribing vs those with local knowledge and understanding of names (local transcriptions by societies may be more accurate)
Is social media friend or foe to Family History Societies?
Josh: Can be biggest foe – If you’re not on social media you don’t exist; life is 2hrs on social media – MUST reply promptly or is it a foe
Carole: can’t/won’t survive without social media; didn’t even know one society organisation: be prepared, where the people are, have memb forms, keep members informed but let others know you’re there
David: FFHO – employed someone to change social media from being foe to friend.
- friends within society, enjoy each other’s successes, don’t do social media., “what’s the membership”
- schedule FB posts to reduce time…needs to be dialogue
What can you get from a society that you cannot get ‘online‘? Are societies providing and promoting whatever this is?
Carole: indexes, transcriptions, experienced members and knowledge, gravestone images/transcriptions from before they were faded through time and weathering.
David: people – here we have Purple people – can’t get those online
My question: does the society have any form of online information to tell potential members what unique indexes etc they hold for their region and others.
How do researchers find out what local databases, indexes and files are held by genealogy societies? How should societies promote these?
Josh: Working on a smartphone app that will beep if you are close to a different society in a new location.
Carole: social media
David: App might overtake social media
It was good to see a session which focused on online-offline research and the role of societies in today’s genealogy. Thanks to Jill, the panel and the audience for your contributions.
This is my final post on Congress and so the end of my role as an official blogger. It was a successful conference with lots of food for thought. Time to collect my thoughts, have a breather and focus on hearth and home for a while.
10 thoughts on “Congress 2015: Panel Session re Societies”
Pauleen I wasn’t able to make it to the session, but it’s great to read the questions and responses given. So thank you for posting this.
You’re welcome Alona..I can’t quite believe how little time we each had to catch up with each other…time just flew.
Thank you so much for your posts and reflections. I do prefer the term family history as surely that is what most of us initially set out to find. The local group I have just recently joined has a small web presence but no social media. http://www.genealogy-noosa.org.au/ For very small groups run entirely by volunteers, it is probably still too early to expect a social media presence. At this stage many small groups do well to list some sort of catalogue online to let prospective researchers know of their existence and resources.
Congratulations on all the posts you’ve done as official blogger. Most appreciated.
Thanks Carmel. I think the whole trade-off between volunteer time and activities is a never-ending challenge….a definite case of choosing “horses for courses”. Glad the various posts from the official bloggers were helpful.
You captured the session well Pauleen, a great summary for me thank you. In talking to friends and work colleagues about my time in Canberra I found I deliberately used ‘family history’ more when describing what I had been doing, rather than ‘genealogy’ because people generally seem to understand what you are talking about…and don’t give you a blank look. That comes later if you talk too long about one of your ancestors!
Interesting feedback re FH Tanya. Maybe makes a point about how we “sell” what we do. Blank looks are of course always free 😉
I think in most cases you only have time for the ‘elevator pitch’ and within that short time you need to use words that people are familiar with, ie, family history and not genealogy.
Seems like more and more of us are thinking the same way but it would take some major effort to change organisations and branding. besides which I think the story part is what has the best chance of hooking people. Don’t know about you but I really dislike the “how far back have you gone?” question.
Thanks Pauleen for the summary. I had to leave early and was sorry to miss it. Nice to see that National Family History Month got a plug, both by Jill and you!
It was also interesting to hear the responses from overseas speakers.